The Concept of Jurisdiction in the Context of International and National Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan

Abstract

the concept of jurisdiction stands at the intersection of international and national law, playing a pivotal role in governing legal relationships within and between states. This article examines the multifaceted nature of jurisdiction, with a focus on its application in both international and national contexts, particularly within the legal framework of the Republic of Uzbekistan. At the international level, jurisdiction determines the authority of courts and tribunals to adjudicate disputes arising between states or other international actors. Despite the absence of the term "international jurisdiction" in international agreements involving Uzbekistan, the concept of "competence" is commonly employed, which some scholars argue is synonymous with international jurisdiction. This discrepancy highlights the complexities surrounding the interpretation and application of jurisdictional principles in the realm of international law. However, the terminology used in Uzbekistan's legal system may differ from international standards, reflecting the unique nuances of its legal tradition and development. The article also explores the evolving understanding of jurisdiction in the context of international treaties and agreements.